Keyword Analysis & Research: jurisdictional hook

cornell.edu

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/03-1454

WebNov 29, 2004 · The second Lopez-Morrison factor protects statutes that contain an "express jurisdictional element that might limit its reach to a discrete set of cases that substantially affect interstate commerce" -- I.E., a "jurisdictional hook."

DA: 22 PA: 99 MOZ Rank: 87

mikeshecket.com

http://lawschool.mikeshecket.com/constitutionallaw/2-3-04.htm

WebFeb 3, 2004 · A jurisdictional hook is an element of the statute that is explicitly tied to the source of federal authority. The presence or absence of a jurisdictional hook is important to the courts’ reasoning, but it’s only one factor to be analyzed. What is the Court going to do? Foley thinks the federal government has four safe votes.

DA: 2 PA: 68 MOZ Rank: 47

uiowa.edu

https://ilr.law.uiowa.edu/sites/ilr.law.uiowa.edu/files/2023-02/Dodge.pdf

WebKameron C. Dodge*. ABSTRACT: The Hobbs Act, passed by Congress in 1946, makes it a federal crime to obstruct, delay, or affect commerce through robbery or extortion. “Commerce” is the federal jurisdictional hook that elevates robbery to a federal crime.

DA: 13 PA: 33 MOZ Rank: 42

uiowa.edu

https://ilr.law.uiowa.edu/print/volume-105-issue-5/hook-line-and-stinker-how-the-jurisdictional-hook-for-hobbs-is-unconstitutionally-broad-leads-to-overcriminalization-and-absurd-resultsnew-article

WebJul 15, 2020 · Iowa Law Review. 105 Iowa L. Rev. 2299 (2020) Download PDF Abstract The Hobbs Act, passed by Congress in 1946, makes it a federal crime to obstruct, delay, or affect commerce through robbery or extortion. “Commerce” is the federal jurisdictional hook that elevates robbery to a federal crime.

DA: 77 PA: 67 MOZ Rank: 51

gmu.edu

https://lawreview.gmu.edu/print__issues/the-meaningless-factual-basis-inquiry-of-rule-11b3/

WebThe factual basis inquiry facilitates this when meaningfully performed. Meaningful factual basis inquiries may result in less guilty pleas for violations of crimes, including crimes with the interstate commerce jurisdictional hook as an element, like section 922 (g) (1), or crimes violating the CSA.

DA: 1 PA: 69 MOZ Rank: 29

federallawyers.com

https://www.federallawyers.com/criminal-defense/hobbs-act-violations-and-interstate-commerce-meeting-the-jurisdictional-hook/

WebMar 21, 2024 · The Hobbs Act’s broad jurisdictional hook makes it a potent prosecutorial tool. Virtually any robbery or extortion can be charged federally under the Act if there is some tangential effect on interstate commerce. Reviews: 685

Reviews: 685

DA: 97 PA: 42 MOZ Rank: 96

stanfordlawreview.org

https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/print/article/the-jurisdictional-label-use-and-misuse/

WebHow are they to know when to apply a rule with jurisdictional rigidity? One answer is that a rule's jurisdictional status (its "jurisdictionality") should follow from the consequences of a rule: a court decides first that the rule should be applied rigidly and …

DA: 54 PA: 25 MOZ Rank: 25

heinonline.org

https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tndl81&div=54&g_sent=1&casa_token=

WebJURISDICTIONAL HOOKS IN THE WAKE OF RAICH: ON PROPERLY INTERPRETING FEDERAL REGULATIONS OF INTERSTATE COMMERCE Tara M. Stuckey* INTRODUCTION When Congress casts its Commerce Clause power into the waters of intrastate and interstate activity, Congress has two important tools at its disposal: the …

DA: 19 PA: 77 MOZ Rank: 11

unl.edu

https://lawreview.unl.edu/sorna-eighth-circuit

WebMar 31, 2009 · In reaching its conclusion, the court relied heavily on the language of § 2250, specifically, the “jurisdictional hook” which required that May move in interstate commerce in order to be convicted. [9] . The court further explained that Congress has long been able to regulate interstate commerce as means of preventing evil and …

DA: 89 PA: 32 MOZ Rank: 58

nd.edu

https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1364&context=ndlr

WebNDLScholarship | Notre Dame Law School Research

DA: 29 PA: 42 MOZ Rank: 18