supreme court tomato case | Nix v. Hedden

Keyword	CPC	PCC	Volume	Score	Length of keyword
supreme court tomato case	1.67	0.2	9370	45	25
supreme	0.23	0.8	3046	17	7
court	1.69	0.1	2252	1	5
tomato	1.25	0.2	2799	51	6
case	0.11	0.1	5359	56	4

Keyword	CPC	PCC	Volume	Score
supreme court tomato case	1.34	0.5	6536	58

Search Results related to supreme court tomato case on Search Engine

Nix v. Hedden - Wikipedia
wikipedia.org

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nix_v._Hedden

WEBNix v. Hedden, 149 U.S. 304 (1893), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court unanimously held that tomatoes should be classified as vegetables rather than fruits for purposes of tariffs, imports and customs.

DA: 83 PA: 16 MOZ Rank: 43

Tomatoes Have Legally Been Vegetables Since 1893
smithsonianmag.com

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/even-supreme-court-maintains-tomato-vegetable-180963133/

WEBMay 10, 2017 · That was the opinion of Supreme Court Justice Horace Gray, released on this day in 1893. “Botanically speaking, tomatoes are the fruit of the vine, just as are cucumbers, squashes, beans and...

DA: 36 PA: 84 MOZ Rank: 20

149 U.S. 304 (1893) - Justia US Supreme Court Center
justia.com

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/149/304/

WEBThe court takes judicial notice of the ordinary meaning of all words in our tongue, and dictionaries are admitted not as evidence, but only as aids to the memory and understanding of the court. Tomatoes are "vegetables," and not "fruit," within the meaning of the Tariff Act of March 3, 1883, c. 121.

DA: 30 PA: 73 MOZ Rank: 19

The Truth About The Supreme Court Case That Declared Tomatoes
grunge.com

https://www.grunge.com/755541/the-truth-about-the-supreme-court-case-that-declared-tomatoes-vegetables/

WEBFeb 2, 2022 · The tomato's legal status as a vegetable dates back to an 1893 Supreme Court case, Nix v. Hedden. According to Justia, the case resulted from a dispute surrounding an 1883 Tariff Act signed into law by President Chester A. Arthur. That Tariff Act required shipping companies to pay a 10% tax on imported vegetables, but not on …

DA: 31 PA: 16 MOZ Rank: 57

The obscure Supreme Court case that decided tomatoes are …
washingtonpost.com

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/10/18/the-obscure-supreme-court-case-that-decided-tomatoes-are-vegetables/

WEBOctober 18, 2017 at 12:16 p.m. EDT. (The Washington Post) It’s a question used to trick schoolkids the nation over: Is the tomato actually a fruit or a vegetable? Botanically, it’s a fruit. But...

DA: 65 PA: 39 MOZ Rank: 37

NIX v. HEDDEN, 149 U.S. 304 (1893) | FindLaw
findlaw.com

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-supreme-court/149/304.html

WEBStatement by Mr. Justice GRAY: [149 U.S. 304, 305] This was an action brought February 4, 1887, against the collector of the port of New York to recover back duties paid under protest on tomatoes imported by the plaintiff from the West Indies in the spring of 1886, which the collector assessed under 'Schedule G.-Provisions,' of the tariff act of...

DA: 97 PA: 88 MOZ Rank: 55

When The Supreme Court Decided Tomatoes Were Vegetables
npr.org

https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2013/12/26/256586055/when-the-supreme-court-decided-tomatoes-were-vegetables

WEBDec 26, 2013 · Planet Money. LISTEN & FOLLOW. When The Supreme Court Decided Tomatoes Were Vegetables. December 26, 201310:04 AM ET. Jess Jiang. Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images. In a recent show, we talked...

DA: 31 PA: 18 MOZ Rank: 72

Why The Supreme Court Ruled That Tomatoes Are A Vegetable
mashed.com

https://www.mashed.com/757104/why-the-supreme-court-ruled-that-tomatoes-are-a-vegetable/

WEBFeb 4, 2022 · The reason the U.S. Supreme Court ruled tomatoes as a vegetable occurred from a lawsuit over tax policy in the 1880s. As cities grew, the global crop trade changed. Rather than selling produce locally, new wholesale companies were transporting fresh fruits and vegetables from faraway fields into urban areas.

DA: 64 PA: 65 MOZ Rank: 100

Nix v. Hedden, 149 U.S. 304 (1893): Case Brief Summary
quimbee.com

https://www.quimbee.com/cases/nix-v-hedden

WEBNix v. Hedden. United States Supreme Court. 149 U.S. 304 (1893) Written by Lauren Petersen, JD. Facts. In 1886, Nix (plaintiff) imported tomatoes from the West Indies to New York City. Hedden (defendant), the collector of the Port of New York, collected import duties on the tomatoes in accordance with the Tariff Act of 1883 (Act).

DA: 70 PA: 99 MOZ Rank: 3

Nix v. Hedden - Wikisource, the free online library
wikisource.org

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Nix_v._Hedden

WEBFeb 21, 2024 · Hedden, 149 U.S. 304 (1893), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court addressed whether a tomato was classified as a fruit or a vegetable under the Tariff Act of March 3, 1883, which required a tax to be paid on imported vegetables, but not fruit.

DA: 42 PA: 29 MOZ Rank: 79